AI response evaluation · 1 / 3
Turn the task into criteria first
The task constrains facts, point count and scope. Success on one dimension does not cancel a violation on another.
Rules for this example
- R1
Use only the supplied material and explicit task requirements.
- R2
Check factual accuracy, instruction following and completeness separately.
Independent example
Task requirements Write two bullet points: one about opening times and one about renewals. Do not add other services.
| Criterion | What to check |
|---|---|
| 01 | Opening times are factually correct |
| 02 | Exactly two points, covering both topics |
| 03 | No services beyond those supplied |
What to do
- List three facts: closed Tuesday, open Wednesday at 10 a.m., and online renewals continuing as usual.
- Separate the two-point format, coverage of opening times and renewals, and prohibition on added services.
- Make each criterion checkable; remove personal style preferences not required by the task.
Common mistake and why it matters
Setting criteria after choosing the nicer-sounding answer can confuse fluency with correctness.
Try making a judgment
Can a friendlier tone replace correct opening times as a criterion?
Input, checks and expanded sections stay only on this page. They are lost when you reload or leave and do not count as completed learning.
Show the reasoning
Reference for this example No.
Style cannot compensate for opening times that contradict the material.
A static explanation of this teaching example, not feedback generated from your input.